Raise awareness of environmental health issues in order to better protect our children and future generations.

04 August 2016

Spain: High Court of Madrid Ruling Recognizes "Electrosensitivity" as Grounds for Total Permanent Disability

UPDATE 29 August 2016:   An auto-translation of the legal decision in the High Court of Madrid, which found in favor of an EHS sufferer, an ex-employee at Ericsson, is included in a post published on Dave Ashton's blog, "Being Electrosensitive":
"Spain - EHS Legally Recognised".

A statement considers for first time "electrosensitivity" as grounds for total permanent disability
by Patricia Esteban, noticias.juridicas.com,
3 August 2016

[Note:  Google translation - we corrected the grammar only in the sub-headings and where very evident.  We are seeking a person fluent in English and Spanish to provide a better translation of this article.]

A statement considers first the "electrosensitivity" as grounds for total permanent disability

A recent ruling by the High Court of Madrid, No. 588/2016 dated 6 July 2016 (rapporteur Mr. Miguel Moreiras Cabellero) has recognized for the first time a situation of total permanent disability for the exercise of the profession of a telecommunications engineer suffering from a rare syndrome, "electrosensitivity syndrome (EHS)", which prevents him from working in environments with electromagnetic fields. It does not recognize, however, an absolute permanent disability.

This little known syndrome causes a number of symptoms (headaches, sleep disorders or muscle aches, even aggressive), now recognized for justice as incapacitating, whose origin is exposure to electromagnetic fields.

The engineer suffering from this syndrome had appealed the sentence in supplication Instance Labour Court No 11 of Madrid, which dismissed his petition and acquitted the National Institute of Social Security (INSS), which had denied the economic benefit.

Now the Supreme Court of Madrid has given reason: his illness prevents him from working as an engineer in telecommunications, but believes that he can work in environments that do not present electromagnetic pollution. But, we wonder, what office currently has no wifi?

He was denied a disability benefit

The appellant, who worked in a known technology multinational, had initiated a sick leave for temporary disability due to common illnesses, and subsequently record of permanent disability.

An initial medical reported that "it is not possible to establish definitive functional limitations electrosensitivity syndrome" and proposed no qualification of the worker as permanently disabled by not presenting anatomical or functional reductions that reduce or remove his working capacity.

In view of these reports, the INSS issued a resolution dated June 6, 2014, by which it remembered deny the actor disability benefits, not reach the injuries suffered by a sufficient degree of reduced working capacity, for constituting a permanent disability.

The Social Court No 11 of Madrid dismissed the claim, considering that his case could not be considered as "absolute permanent disability" requested by the actor.

The key to the favorable judgment: a report of public health

The applicant had in his favor with an expert report Hospital of Guadalajara, in which the patient's symptoms were described to work "in the presence of this exposure to electromagnetic fields". Symptoms such as headache, tinnitus, insomnia and other disorders such as mood changes, nervousness, irritability or aggression, etc., that "improved by moving away from their exposure."

Reducing exposure to electromagnetic pollution 

The court finds that "total permanent disability of the claimant for his usual profession of Telecommunications Engineer because of chemical sensitivity that have or electromagnetic hypersensitivity the Spanish Ministry of Health has called in its version of the International Classification syndrome is reasonably accredited ICD-9-CM disease within the group of non-specific allergies. "

As stated in the contested judgment, the appellant is required by his profession to work in sensitive environments, being in constant daily contact with computers in an environment where there are electromagnetic fields, radio frequency wireless and mobile connections.

Talking by mobile caused tinnitus  

This syndrome, according clarifies the court in its judgment, is an allergy that causes in those who suffer loss induced tolerance, for most recurrent outbreaks, "the radio pollution, cordless phones, mobile phone antennas, WIFI, requiring who affects to minimize their exposure in the home and work environments and avoid places with electromagnetic pollution ".

Unable to work as 'teleco'

Therefore, the court finds that he is unable to work at his workplace (a multinational dedicated to providing telecommunications equipment and solutions).

Proved circumstances, lead, continued the judge, "a reasonable decision to declare the applicant in a situation of total permanent disability for his usual profession of Telecommunications Engineer derived from common illness entitled to receive the corresponding financial benefit under the provisions Article 137.4 of the General Social Security Law. "

"White zones"

The court, however, considers that it can not appreciate a complete inability, because although the plaintiff is unable to work in environments with electromagnetic pollution, this situation does not occur in all sorts of places, so he can work in so-called unpolluted "white zones".

Furthermore, with regard to multiple chemical sensitivity that also suffers syndrome, as discussed in the Background of Fourth Law of the judgment of the Court, " it is not possible to establish permanent sequelae , " and this lack of permanent limitations prevents estimate its claim to be declared in absolute permanent disability pursuant to the provisions of article 136.1 of the General Social Security Law.

Pioneer judgment

Recognition of little known syndromes as a cause of work disability has in recent years battle in court. Conditions that cause a high impact on people who have it, and do not seem to receive the public attention it requires.

The case of telecommunications engineer at the High Court of Madrid has recognized incapacity for suffering electrosensitivity is relevant to be the first time that this condition is considered as the main cause of disability.

Previously, courts had recognized, but associated with other syndromes (chronic fatigue, environmental sensitivity ..). Thus, for example, Case 213/2016 the Supreme Court of Castilla y Leon dated April 6, 2016 or judgment of the Supreme Court 4675/2014 Catalonia dated June 27, 2014.

The case of "fibromyalgia"

Although this condition was included in the International Classification of Diseases by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1991, it has long been considered as "sham" and not a real disease.

The most recent case law, especially in Catalonia (Judgments TSJ Catalonia June 23, 2014, to February 24, 2015, to June 5, 2015, or November 3, 2015) has begun to recognize the importance of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome as a cause of declaration of incapacity for work.

In these judgments underlying the idea that the disability must be understood as the loss of capacity for serious anatomical or functional reductions that reduce or nullify the labor capacity, and without that would inhibit the rating the possibility of recovery of working capacity when it present as uncertain or very long term.

Original article in Spanish:


  1. In the UK they're locking people up in mental prisons and torturing them/ chemically labotomising/ electrodes through the skull etc. for campaigning on this issue and others....

  2. In Switzerland, we know of electrosensitive persons who have lost their jobs due to "inappropriate" attire (wearing protective clothing to protect against EM radiation in the workplace) and also for raising awareness on the issues of EHS and EMF.

  3. Which medical test to proof ehs???i'm hypersensitive to emf too and I would know it...

  4. A recent peer-reviewed scientific paper by Prof. Dominique Belpomme et al. (leading clinical researcher who has diagnosed many persons with EHS), states that electrohypersensitivity (EHS) can be "routinely diagnosed by commercially available simple biological tests... The disorder involves inflammation-related hyper-histaminemia, oxidative stress, autoimmune response, capsulothalamic hypoperfusion and BBB [blood brain barrier] opening, and a deficit in melatonin metabolic availability..."

    It is not known what criteria was used by the expert at the hospital in Guadalajara who diagnosed the affected person but Prof. Belpomme's diagnostic tests are now widely known throughout Europe. See the abstract of his paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26613326.

    Also just published in a scientific revue is the "EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses" which has been widely disseminated. Full text:

    1. thank you Meris for your very good reply to my question
      The follow ine is...Why some people, like marine Richards, has her disease been legally recognised and for the other people no?

    2. It's a tough question to answer. It might be that particular court, the severity of Mme Richard's disability and her persistence in fighting for her rights, the attitude of the French Secretary of State for disability that electrohypersensitivity is not a priority. Mme Richard's functional impairment caused by this condition was evaluated by the court in Toulouse to be 85% and that currently she cannot get a job. Although the court recognized that she suffers from hypersensitivity to electromagnetic waves, whose "description of the clinical signs is irrefutable," it stopped short of recognizing EHS as an illness.

  5. took these people long enough....

  6. Stupid people's science - blaming EHS on RF radiation is like blaming skin cancer on the color yellow. The sun is yellow, so it must cause skin cancer. I don't feel good, Oh, there's WiFi, it must be RF radiation, just let me stop working and give me money.

    1. If ever you become electrosensitive from exposure to RF radiation, only then will you understand the real suffering and disability of this condition.

      This link will take you to some 60 published papers finding adverse biological effects or damage to health from Wi-Fi signals, Wi-Fi-enabled devices or Wi-Fi frequencies (2.4 or 5 GHz).

    2. Hi Meris!
      Fellow sufferer??
      I replied to Anonymous above-clearly just wants to pick a fight.
      Ah well! These people will have to face up to it at some point.
      Hope you coping with it all?


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.