Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appointed U.S. Health Secretary: what prospects for Phonegate?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appointed U.S. Health Secretary: what prospects for Phonegate?
By : Phonegate Team • 17 Feb 2025

On February 13, 2025, the U.S. Senate confirmed Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as U.S. Secretary of Health, opening up new prospects in the fight against the risks associated with cell phone radiation.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: a promising commitment

While Kennedy was President of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), the organization’s teams were instrumental in bringing to light a variety of environmental health issues, including radiofrequencies and the Phonegate scandal.

His past commitment to this issue and his appointment as head of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) give us reason to hope that the U.S. federal authorities will pay greater attention to Phonegate issues.

Our American partner Environmental Health Trust (EHT) welcomed this appointment in a press release dated February 13, 2025:

“Environmental Health Trust congratulates Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on his Senate confirmation to become the 26th Secretary of Health and Human Services. Mr. Kennedy has been a leader in promoting environmental health and in helping to increase public awareness of the detrimental health impacts of wireless radiation on humans, flora, and fauna.”

Concrete results in Europe and soon in the USA?

France: List of cell phones withdrawn or updated for deception and endangering users (update 18 February 2025)

List of cell phones withdrawn or updated for deception and endangering users
By : Phonegate Team • 18 Feb 2025

A total of 57 models of cell phones identified as hazardous to users’ health have either been withdrawn from the French market, or had their Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) updated by software. The latest to date: Ulefone Note 16 Pro and Oukitel WP28, DORO 1800 PLUS, DOOGEE N50, DOOGEE S100 PRO, OSCAL C80, SPC Discovery, Motorola MOTO G53, Nokia G22, HOTWAV Cyber 7, LOGICOM Flow, EMPORIA smart 4 Le DOOGEE S88, EMPORIA simplicity V27, Apple iPhone 12, Motorola Edge, Essentiel Clap 20+, Xiaomi Poco X3 and LOGICOM Le Swipe.

Two Chinese smartphones withdrawn from the French market with worrying delay

On February 17, 2025, the French National Frequency Agency (ANFR) ordered the withdrawal from the market and recall of two smartphones, the Ulefone Note 16 Pro and the Oukitel WP28, following significant breaches of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) limits.

Here are the full tables of SAR values for the two models concerned:

Continue reading:
https://phonegatealert.org/en/list-of-mobile-phones-with-non-compliant-sars-removed-or-updated-in-france-2/

For 50 Years Regulators Ignored Report Linking Wireless Radiation to 23 Chronic Diseases

The U.S. government has known for over 50 years that wireless radiation is linked to 23 chronic diseases but has failed to protect the public from chronic wireless radiation exposure, according to the authors of a new report.

For 50 Years Regulators Ignored Report Linking Wireless Radiation to 23 Chronic Diseases
by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., childrenshealthdefense.org, February 18, 2025

The authors of a new report, posted Feb. 6, discuss how the U.S. Naval Medical Research Institute in 1971 issued a report that reviewed 2,311 scientific studies on the biological and health effects of EMR. They concluded the U.S. government has failed to protect the public from known harms.

Richard Lear and Camilla Rees posted their report on Feb. 6 as a preprint on ResearchGate. Lear and Rees are business executives and long-time health and environmental researchers.

The report, which Rees called a “discussion and commentary” on published science related to wireless radiation’s biological impacts, is geared toward an everyday audience. It is not intended for publication in a peer-reviewed academic journal.

Lear and Rees posted the report on ResearchGate to make it accessible to the public.

On Feb. 14, Rees shared the paper with attendees of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine’s annual conference in San Antonio, Texas, according to a press release.

Miriam Eckenfels, director of Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) & Wireless called the report an “easy-to-understand distillation of pertinent scientific findings that gives the public a sense of how regulatory agencies ignored earlier science and why agencies need to take protective action now.”

United Kingdom: Council becomes first in country to ban smartphones from all its schools - new rule will affect 60,000 pupils

Council becomes first in country to ban smartphones from all its schools - new rule will affect 60,000 pupils
By ADAM POGRUND, dailymail.co.uk, 15 February 2025 | Updated: 17 February 2025

A London council has become the first in the country to ban smartphones from all of its schools, in a new rule which will affect more than 60,000 pupils.

School pupils in Barnet, north London, will be banned from bringing phones into their classrooms from September.

There are 103 primary schools and 23 secondary schools in Barnet which will prohibit their students from bringing in smartphones, according to the Smartphone Free Childhood (SFC) charity.

All schools in the north London borough will also send letters to parents recommending they do not give their children smartphones until they are at least 14 and that they should restrict social media until 16.

Parents will be encouraged to give their children 'brick' phones for travel safety.

Barnet is the first council to include secondary schools in a phone ban. Meanwhile, Ealing, St Albans, Cambridgeshire, Petersfield and Hampshire have prohibited phone use in primary schools

SFC said the 'groundbreaking policy' will mean over 63,000 state-educated children will benefit from a seven-hour window in the day where they can 'learn, socialise and grow, free from addictive algorithms.'

Nova Eden, the charity's regional leader for north London, said: 'There is a lot of evidence to show there is a direct correlation and causative link between the use of smartphones and social media in young children and the rise in cases of depression, anxiety and self-harm.'

Continue reading:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14400503/Council-ban-smartphones-schools-new-rule.html

United States: The Future of Wireless Under RFK Jr. as HHS: A Bold Shift in U.S. Health and Technology Policy

A word about RF Safe: The site was established not as a commercial enterprise but as a platform to raise awareness about EMF exposure. We aim to educate the public on how to reduce risks through practical measures and advocate for updated safety guidelines that reflect current scientific understanding. RF Safe was founded in 1998 by John Coates, following a personal tragedy. After losing his daughter, Angel Leigh Coates, to a neural tube disorder, he dedicated his life to understanding how EMF exposures might influence human health.

The Future of Wireless Under RFK Jr. as HHS: A Bold Shift in U.S. Health and Technology Policy

rfsafe.com, February 14, 2025

The confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) has sparked lively debate among political commentators, journalists, and concerned citizens. Many associate his name with contentious topics—vaccines, environmental litigation, and more. Yet a powerful but sometimes overlooked facet of RFK Jr.’s recent activism centers on wireless radiation and what he sees as a massive public-health blind spot in U.S. regulatory agencies.

Why should this matter to the average person scrolling through their smartphone or working on a laptop connected to Wi-Fi? Because we live in a wireless world, from the cell tower near your child’s school to the router in your living room. New technologies such as 5G have arrived with little or no update to decades-old safety guidelines that focus almost exclusively on thermal effects.

In the following sections, we’ll unpack what RFK Jr. at HHS means for the future of U.S. wireless regulation, how it might disrupt “business as usual” in the telecom industry, and what new technologies might flourish in a world that demands safer emissions. We’ll also explore how an automotive-style emissions-control approach could reshape an entire sector, sparking job creation and innovation.

Why RFK Jr.’s Focus May Surprise You

France’s Proactive Approach to Wireless Radiation—and What It Means for U.S. Policy Under RFK Jr.

This is not the first time that the site "rfsafe" has praised the approach of France in protecting the population from exposure to wireless radiation, however they have failed to mention the testing of SAR levels of smartphones by the French National Frequency Agency (ANFR). The article comes with an excellent video.

France’s Proactive Approach to Wireless Radiation—and What It Means for U.S. Policy Under RFK Jr.

rfsafe.com, February 13, 2025

Can a single country transform the global conversation on technology and health? In the realm of wireless radiation, France has positioned itself as a leading voice by enacting policies that directly address potential health risks, especially for children. In stark contrast, the United States has long been criticized for regulatory inertia and outdated guidelines. Now, with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—a vocal advocate for public health and corporate accountability—confirmed as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), many see a chance for meaningful reform.

This blog post delves into the specifics of France’s approach—from banning Wi-Fi in nursery schools to publicly disclosing radiation data—and scrutinizes how the U.S. has lagged behind. We’ll look at the roles of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the potential impact of RFK Jr. leading HHS. Along the way, we’ll examine scientific studies, highlight the vulnerable status of children, and outline a blueprint for responsible, health-focused wireless technology.

This article expands on a video transcript that compares France’s proactive stance with America’s current policies. We’ll add context, references, and a thorough analysis, rounding out a deeper narrative on how best to protect public health in an era of ubiquitous connectivity.

United States: Establishing the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission

With RFK Jr. being confirmed as HHS Secretary, President Trump has just signed the following executive order to establish the MAHA commission:

Establishing the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission

13 February 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. American life expectancy significantly lags behind other developed countries, with pre‑COVID-19 United States life expectancy averaging 78.8 years and comparable countries averaging 82.6 years. This equates to 1.25 billion fewer life years for the United States population. Six in 10 Americans have at least one chronic disease, and four in 10 have two or more chronic diseases. An estimated one in five United States adults lives with a mental illness.

These realities become even more painful when contrasted with nations around the globe. Across 204 countries and territories, the United States had the highest age-standardized incidence rate of cancer in 2021, nearly double the next-highest rate. Further, from 1990-2021, the United States experienced an 88 percent increase in cancer, the largest percentage increase of any country evaluated. In 2021, asthma was more than twice as common in the United States than most of Europe, Asia, or Africa. Autism spectrum disorders had the highest prevalence in high-income countries, including the United States, in 2021. Similarly, autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and multiple sclerosis are more commonly diagnosed in high-income areas such as Europe and North America. Overall, the global comparison data demonstrates that the health of Americans is on an alarming trajectory that requires immediate action.

Covid Story

Covid Story
by Meris Michaels, 13 February 2025

It has taken me a long time to put into words what I’ve experienced since the start of “Covid-19” back in 2020. I live in Switzerland so the account concerns mainly the experience of Covid in that country.

The initial feeling at the news of increasing numbers of Covid-19 infections globally was one of great un-ease. At first, In Switzerland, there were not enough masks for the population so the authorities told us wearing masks would not be protective. Then masks became available, but I did not put one on until wearing one indoors in public places became compulsory in July 2020. Flights from China, including to Switzerland, were not banned at the start, in February of that year, and debarking passengers were not subject to any kind of screening.

I was never afraid of the infection itself, but much more troubled at the loss of freedoms. Measures were taken to halt the spread of Covid-19 like lockdowns to one degree or another. Switzerland largely kept its schools open during the pandemic. Schools had only been closed once – in spring 2020 compared with an overall 5-7 months in Germany.

Talk of development of a “vaccine” and vaccination campaigns began in December 2020. Switzerland seemed to follow in lock-step with the United States, regarding authorizations for their use – and still does. 

It was then that I began to do my homework. I recall finding information on the Pfizer vaccine from the company itself which cast doubt in my mind about its safety.  The Pfizer document, “5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021”

helped me to definitively decide not to take the vaccination. Appendix 1 at the end of the document comprises a 9-page single-spaced list of “Adverse events” of special interest. This document was available on the Internet at the time.

Swiss Scientists File Criminal Complaint Against Authorities For Ignoring The Acute Danger Of Poisonous Nanotechnology Deployed Via Chemtrails

Swiss Scientists File Criminal Complaint Against Authorities For Ignoring The Acute Danger Of Poisonous Nanotechnology Deployed Via Chemtrails
Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD, 4 February 2025

Criminal complaint against Federal Councillor Rösti for failure to act in an acute danger situation

The Swiss Scientific group WIR, whose research and interview with Reinette Senum I wrote about has filed a criminal complaint against the authorities in Switzerland for ignoring the imminent danger to the population.

Nanotechnological Poisons From Above - Swiss Research Team Reveals Geoengineering "Spider Filaments" Are Polyamide Nanofibers Delivering Highly Toxic Chemicals - We Are Inhaling Them

Bravo! On February 19th I will be joining the team with Reinette for an international live stream. I hope others will take note of this great work by our Swiss colleagues and start filing criminal complaints against their governments for poisoning the people and ignoring the issue.

We have to demand to end this depopulation effort from the skies!

Cellphones and Your Blood: What You Need to Know

Cellphones and Your Blood: What You Need to Know
Environmental Health Trust, Feb 11, 2025

Most of us interact with wireless technology daily, regularly using cellphones and Wi-Fi routers, but an important new study questions just how safe these devices may be. This innovative investigation finds that keeping phones close to the body can cause unhealthy changes in the blood — changes known as rouleaux formation.

Can Cellphones Make Blood Clump Together?

Researchers have found that a living person closely exposed to cellphone radiation, develops red blood cells that begin sticking together, forming clumps that resemble stacks of coins. This in vivo effect has the potential to cause a number of health issues, since clumped blood cells flow less easily and can therefore impact oxygen delivery in the body. The clumps are called rouleaux, and the effect is called rouleaux formation.

Previously, this rouleaux reaction to cellphone exposure had been reported only in studies carried out in vitro, in blood cell samples placed on microscope slides. But this method isn’t always reliable, since blood clumping can sometimes result from the way the sample is prepared.