In a specialist article and discussion contribution in the journal umwelt-medizin-gesellschaft, the authors document aspects of the research on electrohypersensitivity and the psycho-social causes of the controversy as to whether EHS is a fact or imagination.
Available to download in both German and English.
CLICK TO Download: Peter Hensinger / Bernd I. Budzinski (2024): Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation
Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation
Peter Hensinger / Bernd I. Budzinski
posted by Environmental Health Trust, 23 June 2024
Information on this page is from diagnose-funk.org here.
Is electrohypersensitivity (EHS), caused by mobile phone radiation, a fact or all in the imagination? It is comprehensible why the mobile phone industry declares this illness to be imaginary. It would be damaging to their business if their products were associated with the consequences of illness. However, the authorities responsible for health and radiation protection also claim that EHS is a psychological, anxiety-induced reaction. They deny connections with radiation exposure and claim that there is no underlying cause-and-effect mechanism. The available evidence for this correlation and the requirement for causality as a prerequisite for the recognition of a disease are the subject of this article, as are the reasons for discrimination against people with electrohypersensitivity.
Table of Contents
Information on this page is from diagnose-funk.org here.
Is electrohypersensitivity (EHS), caused by mobile phone radiation, a fact or all in the imagination? It is comprehensible why the mobile phone industry declares this illness to be imaginary. It would be damaging to their business if their products were associated with the consequences of illness. However, the authorities responsible for health and radiation protection also claim that EHS is a psychological, anxiety-induced reaction. They deny connections with radiation exposure and claim that there is no underlying cause-and-effect mechanism. The available evidence for this correlation and the requirement for causality as a prerequisite for the recognition of a disease are the subject of this article, as are the reasons for discrimination against people with electrohypersensitivity.
Table of Contents
1. Electrohypersensitivity – an accepted effect of radiation until the 1990s
2. Mechanisms of action for electrohypersensitivity have been decoded
3. The claim of causality as a pseudo-scientific distraction
3.1. Violation of the constitution: Unprotected exposure to radiation without applying the precautionary principle
3.2. The limit values are unacceptable
4. The role of the psyche
4.1. Collective risk displacement
4.2. The unauthorized disease – some further arguments in the public discourse
5.1. Electrohypersensitive reactions meet with a lack of understanding …
5.2. Misconceptions lead to underestimation of the risk
5.3. The thermal dogma is no longer tenable
Information on this page is from diagnose-funk.org
CLICK TO Download: Peter Hensinger / Bernd I. Budzinski (2024): Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation
Diagnose-Funk eV is an independent environmental and consumer protection organization in German-speaking countries that campaigns for protection against electromagnetic radiation. To this end, diagnose:funk educates people about the harmful effects of mobile phone and WLAN radiation, among other things, and calls for future-proof technical solutions for healthy telecommunications.
See Diagnose-Funk EMF Data page with research summaries.
https://ehtrust.org/why-electrohypersensitivity-ehs-is-a-biologically-expected-reaction-to-harmful-radiation/
2. Mechanisms of action for electrohypersensitivity have been decoded
3. The claim of causality as a pseudo-scientific distraction
3.1. Violation of the constitution: Unprotected exposure to radiation without applying the precautionary principle
3.2. The limit values are unacceptable
4. The role of the psyche
4.1. Collective risk displacement
4.2. The unauthorized disease – some further arguments in the public discourse
5.1. Electrohypersensitive reactions meet with a lack of understanding …
5.2. Misconceptions lead to underestimation of the risk
5.3. The thermal dogma is no longer tenable
Information on this page is from diagnose-funk.org
CLICK TO Download: Peter Hensinger / Bernd I. Budzinski (2024): Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation
Diagnose-Funk eV is an independent environmental and consumer protection organization in German-speaking countries that campaigns for protection against electromagnetic radiation. To this end, diagnose:funk educates people about the harmful effects of mobile phone and WLAN radiation, among other things, and calls for future-proof technical solutions for healthy telecommunications.
See Diagnose-Funk EMF Data page with research summaries.
https://ehtrust.org/why-electrohypersensitivity-ehs-is-a-biologically-expected-reaction-to-harmful-radiation/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.