In a specialist article and discussion contribution in the journal umwelt-medizin-gesellschaft, the authors document aspects of the research on electrohypersensitivity and the psycho-social causes of the controversy as to whether EHS is a fact or imagination.
Available to download in both German and English.
CLICK TO Download: Peter Hensinger / Bernd I. Budzinski (2024): Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation
Why electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is a biologically expected reaction to harmful radiation
Peter Hensinger / Bernd I. Budzinski
posted by Environmental Health Trust, 23 June 2024
Information on this page is from diagnose-funk.org here.
Is electrohypersensitivity (EHS), caused by mobile phone radiation, a fact or all in the imagination? It is comprehensible why the mobile phone industry declares this illness to be imaginary. It would be damaging to their business if their products were associated with the consequences of illness. However, the authorities responsible for health and radiation protection also claim that EHS is a psychological, anxiety-induced reaction. They deny connections with radiation exposure and claim that there is no underlying cause-and-effect mechanism. The available evidence for this correlation and the requirement for causality as a prerequisite for the recognition of a disease are the subject of this article, as are the reasons for discrimination against people with electrohypersensitivity.
Information on this page is from diagnose-funk.org here.
Is electrohypersensitivity (EHS), caused by mobile phone radiation, a fact or all in the imagination? It is comprehensible why the mobile phone industry declares this illness to be imaginary. It would be damaging to their business if their products were associated with the consequences of illness. However, the authorities responsible for health and radiation protection also claim that EHS is a psychological, anxiety-induced reaction. They deny connections with radiation exposure and claim that there is no underlying cause-and-effect mechanism. The available evidence for this correlation and the requirement for causality as a prerequisite for the recognition of a disease are the subject of this article, as are the reasons for discrimination against people with electrohypersensitivity.